List of all the controversies related to Donald Rumsfeld in relation to 9/11 attacks in relation to the events of September 10, 2001.

Donald Rumsfeld has been involved in several controversies related to the September 11th terrorist attacks and his role as Secretary of Defense at the time. Some of these controversies include:

1. Meetings on September 10, 2001: Rumsfeld's attendance at a meeting of the Defense Policy Board on September 10, 2001, where he discussed the need for a "cataclysmic and catalyzing event" to justify a war in Iraq, has been criticized as evidence of premeditation and an attempt to use the September 11th attacks as an excuse for a pre-planned war.

2. Lack of military readiness: Rumsfeld has been criticized for not taking adequate steps to prepare the military for a potential terrorist attack on U.S. soil, and for not having a plan in place to respond to such an attack.

3. Role in the Iraq War: Rumsfeld has been criticized for his role in the planning and execution of the Iraq War, and for his handling of the aftermath of the invasion. He has been accused of ignoring evidence that Iraq did not have WMDs and of not adequately planning for the reconstruction of Iraq after the removal of Saddam Hussein's regime.

4. Treatment of detainees: Rumsfeld has been criticized for his role in the development and implementation of U.S. detention and interrogation policies in the aftermath of the September 11th attacks, including the use of "enhanced interrogation techniques" and the detention of suspected terrorists at Guantanamo Bay.

5. Responsibility for military failures: Rumsfeld has been criticized for his management of the military during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, and for his handling of key military decisions, such as the number of troops deployed and the equipment and supplies provided to U.S. troops.

It's important to note that these controversies are complex and multifaceted, and that different perspectives exist on each of these issues. Additionally, many of these controversies are ongoing and continue to be debated by political scientists, policymakers, and the general public.